Hidden Ireland

Kevin Myers Needs To Learn A Lesson.

admin — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:59:27 +0000

“The wide-eyed boy-child we saved, 20 years or so ago, is now a priapic, Kalashnikov-bearing hearty, siring children whenever the whim takes him.” (Myers,Irish Independant 10th July 2008)

“Indeed, we now have almost an entire continent of sexually hyperactive indigents, with tens of millions of people who only survive because of help from the outside world.” (Myers, Irish Independant 10th July 2008)

“Africa, with its vast savannahs and its lush pastures, is giving almost nothing to anyone, apart from AIDS.” (Myers, Irish Independant 10th July, 2008)

They have not yet known the hard way. (Myers, Irish Independant October 30th 2009)

Child Suffering from Malaria

“malaria…….in the almost complete absence of personal self-discipline, that disease is one of the most efficacious forms of population-control now operating (in Ethiopia). (Myers Irish Independant, 10th July 2008)

“That means Africans having to learn simple things like sexual continence, and long-term planning, and deferred reward. We cannot teach them. They must teach themselves these lessons, the hard way if necessary.” (Myers, Irish Independent, 30th October 209)

See: Here and Here for original articles.

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.

“Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying … demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism … [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant … We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”
Margaret Sanger. The Pivot of Civilization, 1922. Chapter on “The Cruelty of Charity,” pages 116, 122, and 189. Swarthmore College Library edition.

“The undeniably feeble-minded should, indeed, not only be discouraged but prevented from propagating their kind.”
Margaret Sanger, quoted in Charles Valenza. “Was Margaret Sanger a Racist?” Family Planning Perspectives, January-February 1985, page 44.

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Original source: Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon’s Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.

Swine Flu – All You Need To Know (DHSSPSNI notwithstanding)

admin — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:15:39 +0000

DONT TAKE THE SWINE FLU VACCINE

the video

Christopher Story-Former Adviser to Margaret Thatcher-Irish Referendum Fixed

admin — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:23:25 +0000

THE IRISH REFERENDUM OUTCOME IS NULL AND VOID

BALLOT BOXES ILLEGALLY DELIVERED 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE

Monday 5 October 2009 00:01

• This article may be cut and pasted UNALTERED AND COMPLETE, with attribution.

• UPDATE 4:00pm UK, 5th October 2009:

• Details of a video clip showing the chaos at the Referendum ballot count in Cork, added below.

In today’s Daily Telegraph, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard writes:

“The methods being used to force this treaty through after electorates have already spoken, cross a line that may not be crossed. The European Project has become the enemy”.

• FACT:
The Editor’s book, ‘The European Union Collective‘, PUBLISHED SEVEN YEARS AGO IN 2002, is subtitled: ‘ENEMY OF ITS MEMBER STATES’.

• QUESTIONS:
Is the so-called Establishment ‘mainstream’ press DOING ITS JOB if it takes its very best journalist SEVEN YEARS to reach a proper understanding of the operation to destroy us? How many times do we all have to be deceived and insulted before the Fourth Estate starts to do its job properly?

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our intelligence books online from this website.

• Please help us with a donation if you can [see 'Donate' above].

IRISH ELECTORAL LAW FLOUTED, CANCELLING OUT THE RESULT

BLATANT AMERICAN INTERFERENCE IN IRELAND’S INTERNAL AFFAIRS

ILLEGAL BLUEPRINT FOR THE INTENDED EUROPEAN GESTAPO

NOTORIOUS IRISH EUROPHILE HINTS AT THIS WEBSITE

YES, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE

PLUS: REPEAT OF THE UPDATE APPENDED TO THE REPORT OF 2ND OCTOBER

• BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION MORE EFFICIENT THAN BLITZKRIEG

• SUBVERSION OF EUROPEAN NATIONS, SUBVERSION OF THE UNITED STATES

IRISH ELECTORAL LAW FLOUTED, CANCELLING OUT THE RESULT
Our published information that the Irish Referendum on the dictatorial Lisbon Treaty was rigged, is ACCURATE. However at the time of the Update to the report dated 2nd October (see below) we hadn’t yet obtained details of the WAY the Referendum was rigged and influenced in favour of the treacherous YES lobby. We now have this information.

This is how the Irish were ‘persuaded’ to change their minds:

(1): Chaos and confusion, by design, at the count:

VIDEO CLIP SHOWS CHAOS AT REFERENDUM COUNT IN CORK
The chaos which appears to have accompanied the premature delivery of the Referendum ballot boxes (enabling them to be pre-stuffed: see below), is confirmed on this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nq-OhRZX8dw

The video shows the front of Cork City Hall, Anglesea Street, Cork, Eire, at 10.33 PM on Friday 2nd October 2009. The video’s written commentary explains that there is no security either outside or inside the building as people arrive carrying ballot boxes with others walking in empty-handed (presumably to count the votes), and all walk inside. Nobody is challenged by any official who is seemingly in authority. The scene is chaotic. People are seen coming out of the building as well.

One man is seen going in empty-handed, and coming out with what is pretty obviously a ballot box. The camera operator does not follow him, so the man disappears out of camera shot. Seconds later he returns with the ballot box (there is no way of knowing if it is even the same one) and then takes it back inside the building.

The camera operator goes inside the building (unchallenged). He films people arriving, milling around, talking to each other. There are rows of chairs set out and some tables set up (for the counting of ballot papers). Again, no one seems to check whether those inside are there officially, as no one seems to be in charge. There is no sign of a Returning Officer or of electoral officials. People move in and out of the hall.

One man is heard singing a song which appears to make fun of those who have voted NO in the Referendum. The sound quality is poor.

The written commentary adds:

‘There were so many people coming and going unchallenged, that it would have been quite simple to take their box of Referendum votes in privacy (sic) for anything up to 10 to 15 minutes, and it would not have been detected’.

The written commentary concludes:
‘ANYONE COULD HAVE INTERFERED WITH THE BALLOT BOXES’.

(2): Ballot boxes may have been stuffed prior to the Referendum polling booths opening.

Specifically:

• Under Irish law, ballot boxes are required to be delivered by members of the garda (police) to the polling stations at 7:00 am on the date the election takes place.

• This legal requirement applies to ALL polling in Ireland, whether elections or referenda.

• On this occasion, however, the ballot boxes were delivered to the private residences of the polling/Returning Officers, 48 hours prior to the Referendum.

• A number of honest Returning Officers formally objected to this BREACH OF PROCEDURE, and to the concomitant prospective breach of security, let alone of the electoral legislation.

• We understand that such objections were officially dismissed out of hand on the spurious and diversionary grounds that the ballot boxes possessed no commercial value, so it would be in nobody’s commercial interest to steal them.

• The central issue – that since the Irish ballot boxes were delivered 48 hours early they could be ‘stuffed’ with YES votes, as routinely happens in places like the former Soviet Republic of Georgia – was of course not addressed.

• It follows that, given that the local electoral law was flouted, THE OUTCOME OF THE IRISH REFERENDUM IS FRAUDULENT AND MUST IMMEDIATELY BE DECLARED NULL AND VOID.

• Furthermore, the following questions NEED TO BE ANSWERED IMMEDIATELY:

ONE: What is the total number of registered voters in Ireland?

TWO: How many voters voted in the Referendum?

THREE: Was the total vote tally greater than #One AND/OR #Two above?

FOUR: If either or both apply, do ‘phantom’, stolen and/or ‘dead people’s’ votes count?

• Any operation to steamroller the Lisbon Treaty (after the Polish and Czech Governments have been bribed by the Germans) will accordingly be FRAUDULENT on this basis alone.

• It will therefore follow that ALL MEASURES taken under the Lisbon Treaty will likewise be illegal – not that this is anything new, as the European Union Collective is itself blatantly illegal, not least because the Treaty of Rome documents were never properly signed (given that several attendees signed blank sheets of paper because their translations were not available at the time of signing).

(3): Blatant American interference in the internal affairs of Ireland:

• INTEL (which is of course a US intelligence community operation, as its name implies) advertised heavily for a YES vote, promoting the FALSE assessment that if the Irish voted NO, ‘Ireland could be left isolated from the European Single Market at a time when the economy needs support’ (1) (because it has been ENRONISED by the Syndicate, as previously explained in these reports).

• That assertion was a blatant falsehood. The Single Market operates under the successive treaties of the fraudulent EU Collective, the currently applicable one being the Nice Treaty. Therefore, whether Lisbon was approved or not would make no difference at all.

• Thus the CIA’s INTEL was LYING TO THE IRISH PEOPLE.

On the basis of this precedent, we presume that the United States would have no objection if, say, the British were to buy newspaper space and broadcast time to lobby for a given outcome every time the United States goes to the polls.

(One can imagine how FURIOUS Americans would be if we tried any such outrage).

• This blatant US intelligence community interference in Irish internal affairs by the engine of instability which has ravaged the Irish financial economy represents yet another odious example of the notorious tendency for the CIA to interfere in the domestic affairs of other countries in pursuit of its own selfish objectives – in this case, shoring up the prospectively disintegrating European wing of the TWIN DVD operation to assert the hegemony of pan-German long-range control strategy on the two main victors of the World Wars, Britain and America.

• Unsurprisingly, letters are now appearing in the press [as for instance in The Sunday Telegraph of 4th October] making our point that the so-called Special Relationship is a total farce and has been for decades, as the United States routinely treats Britain with contempt: as, for instance, by allowing the DVD-activated IRA and its splinters to raise money in the United States for the purpose of murdering British citizens and troops en masse.

• The fraudulent Irish Referendum outcome theoretically destroys residual British sovereignty, given that the EU exists explicitly to usurp and hijack the sovereignty of its satrap ‘Member States’: see the Editor’s work ‘The European Union Collective: Enemy of its Member States’ [available from the Edward Harle Limited books segment of this website].

ILLEGAL BLUEPRINT FOR THE INTENDED EUROPEAN GESTAPO
Officials in Brussels have ALREADY set up a Committee on Internal Security (COSI) under the Lisbon Treaty EVEN THOUGH THE LISBON TREATY HAS NOT BEEN RATIFIED. THIS IS ANOTHER BLATANTLY ILLEGAL ACT which renders ALL operations of this Stalinist-sounding revolutionary oppression mechanism ILLEGAL in perpetuity.

• It also calls into question the very purpose of the Irish Referendum itself, raising the rhetorical question: what is the point of bothering the Irish electorate with this latest insult to their tranquillity and intelligence, if the EU’s bureaucrats, who are ANSWERABLE TO NOBODY, have been going ahead with provisions of the Lisbon Treaty even though it has not been ratified?

(They have been doing this in many other areas, too).

• Of course, the purpose of the Irish Referendum to get the insulted Irish electorate to change its mind from the verdict that it handed down in the Referendum of June 2008 is purely and simply to provide the intended illegitimate and illegal operations of the EU Collective with a false veneer of ‘legitimacy’, in the knowledge that the lazy and sycophantic so-called ‘mainstream’ media will just cow-tow and go along with these obnoxious illegalities. In so doing, journalists are validating the illegal behaviour of the manipulators that we have identified.

• Under the illegal COSI blueprint (in which, of course, as usual, the treacherous, revolutionary British authorities participated illegally), law enforcement and “public security organizations” will share intelligence, material from Internet surveillance, and other elements of national security arrangements, acquiring powers over the satrap Member States’ police and security services (2).

• A spokesman for the European Civil Liberties Network, Tony Bunyan, summarised the position correctly with the following statement. The COSI arrangements, implemented illegally PRIOR TO RATIFICATION of the Lisbon Treaty, represented a step towards an ‘EU Home Office or Interior Ministry without any democratic control’. Making the mistake of accepting this outrage as a fait accompli, he nevertheless elaborated:

‘It is outrageous that the rôle of the new EU Internal Security Committee has been decided in secret. If COSI becomes a high-level legislative body, a swathe of decision-making and practice will be removed from democratic debate’.

• The Lisbon Treaty WHICH HAS NOT BEEN RATIFIED, provides that: ‘A standing committee shall be set up within the [European] Council in order to ensure that operational co-operation on internal security is promoted and strengthened within the union’.

• ‘Unbelievably’ (but then again, NOT), an unnamed official involved in this treasonous activity said: ‘Sometimes it is better not to spell things out too much in order to keep flexibility and to allow officials the creativity of a blank slate’. Translation from weasel-language into jackboot Nazi-speak:

• ‘We require absolute unfettered carte blanche to impose our dictatorship upon the satrap peoples of Europe and we won’t brook any interference with our stolen prerogative to saddle them with a control régime which will ensure our total hegemony, whether they like it or not’.

NOTORIOUS IRISH EUROPHILE HINTS AT THIS WEBSITE
The former Attorney General of Ireland and now Chairman of British Petroleum, a man notorious for his slavish ideological support for the European Union Collective, Peter Sutherland, was reported on 4th October 2009 to have made the following statement as soon as the rigged Irish Referendum outcome had been announced:

‘This is an outstanding victory for common sense. It was the result of dispelling myths, some of which emanated from the United Kingdom. This was a great achievement with a government in some difficulty and a vital step forward for Ireland’.

• However the YES lobby dispensed MYTHS on a prodigious scale, the primary myth being the lie, identified above, that ‘Ireland could be left isolated from the European Single Market’, when in fact the outcome of the Referendum would and could MAKE NO DIFFERENCE.

• Sutherland, who hates the likes of us, hinted that what we say about the European Commission being a criminal enterprise, is false. In that case, Mr Sutherland, we suggest that you should take the matter up (a) with the UK Serious Fraud Office in London [see our reports dated 2nd October and 16th/20th September 2009]; and (b) with the European Court of Auditors in Luxembourg [see our report dated 2nd October 2009].

YES, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
For, as discussed in our report dated 2nd October, the executive arm of the European Union Collective is a CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, given that its financial accounts have been specifically DISAPPROVED by the EU’s own Court of Auditors for the past 14 financial years running. For the record, we repeat the information on this subject contained in that report:

• OPEN-ENDED EUROPEAN COMMISSION CORRUPTION:
As previously reported by this service, the accounts of the European Commission have been rejected FOR THE PAST 14 YEARS RUNNING by the European Union’s own expert Court of Auditors. This means that the European Commission, which is an illegitimate corporate entity anyway, is a CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE. It must be continually exposed as such.

Further, the UK Serious Fraud Office have specifically CONFIRMED that remittance of taxpayers’ funds into the hands of a criminal enterprise IS OF COURSE ITSELF A CRIMINAL OFFENCE.

What is more, our Irish associate, Richard Sharpe, visited the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg recently and obtained SPECIFIC CONFIRMATION from an official there, MR GEZA NOVACS, who told Richard that quote ‘the European Accounts have not been signed off (‘qualified’) for fourteen years or more’ unquote.

That is to say, THEY ARE INDEED FRAUDULENT.

Given this state of affairs, the European Commission’s accounts CAN NEVER BE RECTIFIED. For that to happen, it would be necessary to go back to the last set of accounts that WAS APPROVED (15 YEARS AGO) and to work through all the detail, identifying the frauds and perpetrators of fraud, initiating proceedings against them, revealing every single theft and misappropriation in Notes to the Accounts, and implementing the necessary accounting adjustments. This operation would take years and of course IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN.

THEREFORE the European Commission will remain a CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE IN PERPETUITY.

This was all reported in the exposure analysis posted here on 16th/20th September. The relevant text was reappended as Note 1 to the report dated 2nd October [Archive].

•NOTE: We understand that our reiteration of these painful realities is now causing the Eurocracy and the free-wheeling anti-nation state ‘Useful Idiot’ Europhile community considerable disquiet.

AND WE REPEAT HERE THE UPDATE APPENDED TO THE 2ND OCTOBER REPORT

UPDATE, 4th October 2009:

IRISH LISBON TREATY REFERENDUM ‘WAS RIGGED’
Our very informed sources state AS FACT that the Irish Referendum on the Lisbon Treaty has been rigged. The article below, as you may have noticed, was angled so as to seek to persuade voters to see sense. But the nests of serpents with which we are dealing are dense. The European Union and its Commission are criminal enterprises, after all: this insufferable Germanic institution exists for the sole purpose of hijacking and usurping BY STEALTH its satrap ‘Member States” national sovereignty. That is its ENTIRE purpose, as is explained in the Editor’s exhaustive European study entitled ‘The European Union Collective: Enemy of its Member States’ (2002) [available from this website: see Edward Harle Limited Books segment].

It is AN IMMENSE, LONG-RANGE GRADUALIST OPERATION, aided and abetted by traitors inside the European national political and bureaucratic establishments, modelled on Hitler’s ‘Coup d’etat by installments’. That phrase was originally coined by a German living in the United States, Konrad Heiden, and published in his book ‘Der Fuehrer’, Boston, 1944, on page 579, cited in ‘Thirty Days: Hitler’s Thirty Days to Power, January 1933′, by the US author, Henry Ashby Turner Jr. [Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, MA and New York, 1996].

In a remarkable new study (3), the Regius Professor of Modern History at Cambridge University, Richard J. Evans, explains, amid his horrific and meticulous accounts of the routine atrocities perpetrated by the internally feuding Nazis and their gauleiters (going far, far beyond what the general public holds in its eroding collective memory), that the most conspicuous and perpetual feature of the Nazi regime was: RAMPANT CORRUPTION, PILLAGING, STEALING, GRAFT AND CONVERSION/DIVERSION OF ASSETS: in other words, WHAT WE HAVE BEEN RECORDING.

• Moreover the gauleiters and their associates STOLE FROM AND RANSACKED EACH OTHER.

• Does that sound familiar? Of course it does. THAT’S WHAT THESE NAZIS DO.

And it is this CORRUPTION that has survived to destabilise the whole world in OUR TIME.

BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION MORE EFFICIENT THAN BLITZKRIEG
Because what has happened is that these Nazis, using the big German, Swiss and French banks, and the Vatican, later to be joined by British institutions, found that BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION, which came naturally to them anyway, was a more efficient means of achieving their demented hegemony objectives than military force and Blitzkrieg.

Had the Editor not discovered and experienced this from INSIDE THE SNAKE DEN, we wouldn’t have been in a position to expose this behaviour ‘from within’. Our unspeakable experience, therefore, was ‘meant to happen’, so that these exposures could be framed and published in our journal and on this website for the whole world to see and understand.

• The point here being that FRAUD, BRIBERY AND BALLOT-RIGGING go hand in hand with the sick Fraudulent Finance practices proliferated originally by the pan-German FIFTH COLUMN inside the US Intelligence Power, WHICH IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.

SUBVERSION OF EUROPEAN NATIONS, SUBVERSION OF THE UNITED STATES
The ‘Coup d’etat by installments’ in Europe is the TWIN OPERATION, running in parallel with Nazi subversion of the United States by the same operatives, masterminded by the long-range strategic deception ‘Black’ Nazi Continuum agency based at Dachau, which operates ‘independently’ of the German Chancellor. Obviously, Hitler’s ‘Coup d’etat by installments’ was implemented over a much shorter timeframe: BUT THE PRINCIPLE IS THE SAME. The rigged Irish Referendum outcome is just another dirty step towards the imminent smothering of the residual sovereignty of the once great nations of Europe, with Britain ALWAYS seen by the pan-German snakes as the main target.

On page 164 of ‘Thirty Days’, the author described Hitler’s ‘Coup d’etat by Installments’ as follows:

‘Only by banning the Communist deputies and by resorting to intimidation and mendacity did Hitler secure on March 23 the necessary two-thirds vote in the new Reichstag for an Enabling Act that transferred legislative authority to his Cabinet, ostensibly for four years. A wave of Nazi purges followed, as one institution after another was subjugated. Arbitrary rule replaced government by law in what has aptly been termed a “Coup d’etat by installments”‘.

‘By summer, all parties except the Nazis had been dissolved, Hugenberg had been forced out of the Cabinet and Hitler had relegated Papen to insignificance by winning the trust of the President. Even earlier Goering had wrested from Papen control over the government of the largest state, Prussia. Well before the Nazi leader assumed the powers of the Presidency upon the death of Hindenburg in August 1934, he had become dictator of Germany’.

THIS IS THE MODEL, OPERATING IN GRADUALIST MODE, THAT IS BEING DEPLOYED TO SUBVERT THE RESIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY OF THE STUPID EUROPEAN NATIONS, LED BY TRAITORS AND DESPICABLE DUMKOPFS WITHIN THE NATIONAL STRUCTURES, WHO HAVE CONFUSED COOPERATION WITH SOCIALIST ‘COLLECTIVISATION’ (4).

That the Irish Referendum has been rigged is therefore NO SURPRISE. For we are dealing with ruthless crooks, which is why they are keen on having the British deceiver, intelligence operative and crook, Tony BLIAR, as their first President, to match that disgusting little Portuguese operative, Barroso. Stand by now for consequences similar, in the contemporary context, to those events that followed Hitler’s acquisition of GENERAL POWERS from the Legislature by means of INTIMIDATION and MENDACITY, the techniques which, with bribery, have been used to rig the Referendum (5).

Notes and References:

1: The Sunday Telegraph, Business Section, 4th October 2009.

2: The Sunday Telegraph, page 3, 4th October 2009.

3: Richard J. Evans, Regius Professor of Modern History, Cambridge University, ‘The Third Reich at War’, The Penguin Press, New York, 2009, ISBN 978-1-59420-2006-3.

4: The Editor first understood this when he found himself sitting next to the former British Foreign Secretary, Douglas (Lord) Hurd, on a plane some years ago. Although the Editor carefully avoided confronting Hurd until the end of the flight, he established that Hurd valued British membership of the EU Collective because it fostered ‘cooperation’. However one can cooperate with an external party without getting into bed with them. It was further clear that, wittingly or not, he confused this naïve, mythical ideal of ‘cooperation’ – which suddenly evaporates when the Germans and French want their own way and browbeat all the other EU satrap states in order to get it – with the reality, namely CREEPING COLLECTIVISATION via ever-expanding oppressive regulation which is designed to usurp and destroy national sovereignty – the same objective as Lenin, Stalin and Hitler. So you can appreciate why these ‘Useful Idiots’ (as Lenin called all those who assist the World Revolution without realising what they are doing) are justly called TRAITORS.

5: We are describing and living through components, phases and elements of the ONGOING WORLD REVOLUTION, in case you hadn’t noticed.

• We will revert to the ‘usual issues’ soon, but, as you will appreciate, these matters are of vital importance and had to be addressed straight away.

New York Times Covers Reality of Abortion

admin — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:05:47 +0000

Behind the Scenes: Picturing Fetal Remains:CLICK HERE

by Damien Cave

The photographs are graphic and detailed, showing the fingers or toes of aborted fetuses whose entire frames are no bigger than a cellphone. Since the mid-1990s, they have appeared all over the country — carried as posters by protesters, handed out with pamphlets or, in some cases, mounted like billboards on the sides of trucks…….

Ireland: Vote No To Lisbon 2009!

admin — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:09:17 +0000

My eyes have been wet with the tears of children………

Padraig Pearse

Hat TIp to Credo.

We yearn for the days when the Church was strong and the Bishops, lead by the graces from the Mass, spoke the eternal Truths loud and clear. The Princes of the Church in Ireland are now weak and misguided. Pray that the Faith remains stong in the belly of the people and they will reject this heathen treaty which threatens each man, woman and child of this country.

Pray for Our Church and our Bishops that they will become strong again. Pray to Our Lady of La Sallete, as did the peasants of the Vendee, that she will restrain her Son’s arm.

If we are to suffer, let it be well.

“Place on thy heart one drop of the Precious Blood of Jesus and fear nothing” Pope Pius ix

This Is What An Anti Feminist Looks Like…….Fear Us

admin — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:37:54 +0000

Hat Tip to Tinker Girls Blog for these great posters!

United Nations is beneath contempt: Guidelines for the perversion of 5 year olds.

admin — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 00:05:41 +0000

Children in Nambia

The United Nations has produced “guidelines” (ed: not that old Marxist chestnut again) which it calls “international” recommending that children of five years of age should be tought impurity.

Fox News reports:

“NEW YORK — The United Nations is recommending that children as young as five receive mandatory sexual education that would teach even pre-kindergarteners about masturbation and topics like gender violence.“

To see the complete text of the International Guidelines on Sexuality Education click here.

Objectives for the 5 to 8 year-old category include learning about:

Private body parts that can feel pleasure when touched by oneself
Basic information regarding conception, fertilization, pregnancy and childbirth
The natural exploration of one’s own body
Masturbation: the touching and rubbing one’s genitals
Cultural and religious messages regarding sex, gender and sexuality
Gender roles, gender inequality and gender-based violence
Consensual sexual activity and sexual abuse
Male and female sexual organs
Sexual diversity
HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infections

Pray to God that these people are stopped soon and that the Consecration of Russia takes place. Nothing on a natural level will stop this demonic New World Order.

Mark 9:41 Douay-Rheims Bible

And whosoever shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me; it were better for him that a millstone were hanged around his neck, and he were cast into the sea

Children in Jerusalem

Senator Edward Kennedy: Stop pretending: Why will nobody tell the truth?

admin — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:23:49 +0000

Amid the reams of adulation unleashed at the death of Senator Kennedy, by the Irish political class and the media, there seems to be little account of the fact that objectively the man was not acting like a Catholic. Apart from his private life, which was public, and the scandal of Mary Jo Kopechne’s death, see below for his voting record on abortion.

“If Ted Kennedy were arrested for being Catholic, there wouldn’t be enough evidence to convict him.” - Msgr. William Smith, Academic Dean of St.Joseph’s Seminary, NY

It is of great concern that Senator Kennedy had such an influence over Irish affairs and was so close to many influential people here. What kind of political system has been promoted? Should be be surprised at the degradation of Irish societry whan our “leaders” are listening to friends such as this?

For a view on the fact that Senator Kennedy was afforded a public Catholic funeral click here for an open letter to Cardinal O’Malley.

We should of course pray for his soul, may God have mercy on him.

Ted Kennedy on Abortion

Democratic Sr Senator (MA)

Voted NO on defining unborn child as eligible for SCHIP.

CONGRESSIONAL SUMMARY: To require that legislation to reauthorize SCHIP include provisions codifying the unborn child regulation. Amends the definition of the term “targeted low-income child” to provide that such term includes the period from conception to birth, for eligibility for child health assistance.

SUPPORTER’S ARGUMENT FOR VOTING YES:Sen. ALLARD: This amendment will codify the current unborn child rule by amending the SCHIP reauthorization reserve fund. This amendment will clarify in statute that the term “child” includes the period from conception to birth. This is a pro-life vote.OPPONENT’S ARGUMENT FOR VOTING NO: Sen. FEINSTEIN: We already clarified SCHIP law that a pregnant woman’s coverage under SCHIP law is optional. We made it obligatory so every pregnant woman has the advantage of medical insurance. This amendment undoes that. It takes it away from the woman and gives it to the fetus. Now, if a pregnant woman is in an accident, loses the child, she does not get coverage, the child gets coverage. We already solved the problem. If you cover the pregnant woman, you cover her fetus. What Senator Allard does is remove the coverage from the pregnant woman and cover the fetus.LEGISLATIVE OUTCOME:Amendment rejected, 46-52

Reference: Bill S.Amdt.4233 to S.Con.Res.70 ; vote number 08-S081 on Mar 14, 2008

Voted NO on prohibiting minors crossing state lines for abortion.

CONGRESSIONAL SUMMARY: To increase funding for the vigorous enforcement of a prohibition against taking minors across State lines in circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions consistent with the Child Custody Protection Act.

SUPPORTER’S ARGUMENT FOR VOTING YES:Sen. ENSIGN: This amendment enables enforcing the Child Custody Protection Act, which passed the Senate in a bipartisan fashion by a vote of 65 to 34. Too many times we enact laws, and we do not fund them. This is going to set up funding so the law that says we are going to protect young children from being taken across State lines to have a surgical abortion–we are going to make sure those people are protected. OPPONENT’S ARGUMENT FOR VOTING NO:Sen. BOXER: We already voted for $50 million to enhance the enforcement of child protective laws. If Sen. Ensign’s bill becomes law, then that money is already there to be used for such a program. LEGISLATIVE OUTCOME:Amendment rejected, 49-49 (1/2 required, or 50 votes; Sen. Byrd & Sen. McCain absent)

Reference: Bill S.Amdt.4335 to S.Con.Res.70 ; vote number 08-S071 on Mar 13, 2008

Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines.

Allows federal funding for research that utilizes human embryonic stem cells, regardless of the date on which the stem cells were derived from a human embryo, provided such embryos:

have been donated from in vitro fertilization clinics;
were created for the purposes of fertility treatment;
were in excess of the needs of the individuals seeking such treatment and would otherwise be discarded; and
were donated by such individuals with written informed consent and without any financial or other inducements.

Proponents support voting YES because:

Since 2 years ago, the last Stem Cell bill, public support has surged for stem cells. Research is proceeding unfettered and, in some cases, without ethical standards in other countries. And even when these countries have ethical standards, our failures are allowing them to gain the scientific edge over the US. Some suggest that it is Congress’ role to tell researchers what kinds of cells to use. I suggest we are not the arbiters of research. Instead, we should foster all of these methods, and we should adequately fund and have ethical oversight over all ethical stem cell research.

Opponents support voting NO because:

A good deal has changed in the world of science. Amniotic fluid stem cells are now available to open a broad new area of research. I think the American people would welcome us having a hearing to understand more about this promising new area of science. As it stands today, we will simply have to debate the bill on the merits of information that is well over 2 years old, and I think that is unfortunate.

The recent findings of the pluripotent epithelial cells demonstrates how quickly the world has changed. Wouldn’t it be nice to have the researcher before our committee and be able to ask those questions so we may make the best possible judgment for the American people?
Status: Vetoed by Pres. Bush Bill passed, 63-34

Reference: Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act; Bill S.5 & H.R.3 ; vote number 2007-127 on Apr 11, 2007

Voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.

This bill prohibits taking minors across State lines in circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions. Makes an exception for an abortion necessary to save the life of the minor. Authorizes any parent to sue unless such parent committed an act of incest with the minor. Imposes a fine and/or prison term of up to one year on a physician who performs an abortion on an out-of-state minor in violation of parental notification requirements in their home state.

Proponents recommend voting YES because:

This bill deals with how young girls are being secretly taken across State lines for the purpose of abortion, without the consent of their parents or even the knowledge of their parents, in violation of the laws of the State in which they live. 45 states have enacted some sort of parental consent laws or parental notification law. By simply secreting a child across State lines, one can frustrate the State legislature’s rules. It is subverting and defeating valid, constitutionally approved rights parents have.

Opponents recommend voting NO because:

Some States have parental consent laws, some don’t. In my particular State, it has been voted down because my people feel that if you ask them, “Do they want their kids to come to their parents?”, absolutely. But if you ask them, “Should you force them to do so, even in circumstances where there could be trouble that comes from that?”, they say no.

This bill emanates from a desire that our children come to us when we have family matters, when our children are in trouble, that they not be fearful, that they not be afraid that they disappoint us, that they be open with us and loving toward us, and we toward them. This is what we want to have happen. The question is: Can Big Brother Federal Government force this on our families? That is where we will differ.

Reference: Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act; Bill S.403 ; vote number 2006-216 on Jul 25, 2006

Voted YES on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives.

Vote to adopt an amendment to the Senate’s 2006 Fiscal Year Budget that allocates $100 million for the prevention of unintended pregnancies. A YES vote would expand access to preventive health care services that reduce unintended pregnancy (including teen pregnancy), reduce the number of abortions, and improve access to women’s health care. A YES vote would:

Increase funding and access to family planning services
Funds legislation that requires equitable prescription coverage for contraceptives under health plans
Funds legislation that would create and expand teen pregnancy prevention programs and education programs concerning emergency contraceptives

Reference: Appropriation to expand access to preventive health care services; Bill S.Amdt. 244 to S Con Res 18 ; vote number 2005-75 on Mar 17, 2005

Voted NO on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime.

Bill would make it a criminal offense to harm or kill a fetus during the commission of a violent crime. The measure would set criminal penalties, the same as those that would apply if harm or death happened to the pregnant woman, for those who harm a fetus. It is not required that the individual have prior knowledge of the pregnancy or intent to harm the fetus. This bill prohibits the death penalty from being imposed for such an offense. The bill states that its provisions should not be interpreted to apply a woman’s actions with respect to her pregnancy. Reference: Unborn Victims of Violence Act; Bill S.1019/HR.1997 ; vote number 2004-63 on Mar 25, 2004

Voted NO on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life.

S. 3 As Amended; Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Vote to pass a bill banning a medical procedure, which is commonly known as “partial-birth” abortion. Those who performed this procedure would then face fines and up to two years in prison, the women to whom this procedure is performed on are not held criminally liable. This bill would make the exception for cases in which a women’s life is in danger, not for cases where a women’s health is in danger.

Reference: Bill S.3 ; vote number 2003-51 on Mar 12, 2003

Voted NO on maintaining ban on Military Base Abortions.

Vote on a motion to table [kill] an amendment that would repeal the ban on privately funded abortions at overseas military facilities. Reference: Bill S 2549 ; vote number 2000-134 on Jun 20, 2000

Voted NO on banning partial birth abortions.

This legislation, if enacted, would ban the abortion procedure in which the physician partially delivers the fetus before completing the abortion. [A NO vote supports abortion rights].
Status: Bill Passed Y)63; N)34; NV)3 Reference: Partial Birth Abortion Ban; Bill S. 1692 ; vote number 1999-340 on Oct 21, 1999

Voted NO on banning human cloning.

This cloture motion was in order to end debate and move to consideration of legislation banning human cloning. [A YES vote opposes human cloning].
Status: Cloture Motion Rejected Y)42; N)54; NV)4 Reference: Motion to invoke cloture on motion to proceed to S. 1601; Bill S. 1601 ; vote number 1998-10 on Feb 11, 1998

Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.

Kennedy scores 100% by NARAL on pro-choice voting record

For over thirty years, NARAL Pro-Choice America has been the political arm of the pro-choice movement and a strong advocate of reproductive freedom and choice. NARAL Pro-Choice America’s mission is to protect and preserve the right to choose while promoting policies and programs that improve women’s health and make abortion less necessary. NARAL Pro-Choice America works to educate Americans and officeholders about reproductive rights and health issues and elect pro-choice candidates at all levels of government. The NARAL ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization’s preferred position.

Source: NARAL website 03n-NARAL on Dec 31, 2003

Expand embryonic stem cell research.

Kennedy signed a letter from 58 Senators to the President

Dear Mr. President:

We write to urge you to expand the current federal policy concerning embryonic stem cell research.

Embryonic stem cells have the potential to be used to treat and better understand deadly and disabling diseases and conditions that affect more than 100 million Americans, such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, and many others.

We appreciate your words of support for the enormous potential of this research, and we know that you intended your policy to help promote this research to its fullest. As you know, the Administration’s policy limits federal funding only to embryonic stem cells that were derived by August 9, 2001.

However, scientists have told us that since the policy went into effect more than two years ago, we have learned that the embryonic stem cell lines eligible for federal funding will not be suitable to effectively promote this research. We therefore feel it is essential to relax the restrictions in the current policy for this research to be fully explored.

Among the difficult challenges with the current policy are the following:

While it originally appeared that 78 embryonic stem cell lines would be available for research, only 19 are available to researchers.
All available stem cell lines are contaminated with mouse feeder cells, making their therapeutic use for humans uncertain.
It is increasingly difficult to attract new scientists to this area of research because of concerns that funding restrictions will keep this research from being successful.
Despite the fact that U.S. scientists were the first to derive human embryonic stem cells, leadership in this area of research is shifting to other countries.

We would very much like to work with you to modify the current embryonic stem cell policy so that it provides this area of research the greatest opportunity to lead to the treatments and cures for which we are all hoping. Source: Letter from 58 Senators to the President 04-SEN8 on Jun 4, 2004

Rated 0% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-choice stance.

Kennedy scores 0% by the NRLC on abortion issues

OnTheIssues.org interprets the 2006 NRLC scores as follows:

0% – 15%: pro-choice stance (approx. 174 members)
16%- 84%: mixed record on abortion (approx. 101 members)
85%-100%: pro-life stance (approx. 190 members)

About the NRLC (from their website, www.nrlc.org):

The ultimate goal of the National Right to Life Committee is to restore legal protection to innocent human life. The primary interest of the National Right to Life Committee and its members has been the abortion controversy; however, it is also concerned with related matters of medical ethics which relate to the right to life issues of euthanasia and infanticide. The Committee does not have a position on issues such as contraception, sex education, capital punishment, and national defense. The National Right to Life Committee was founded in 1973 in response to the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision, legalizing the practice of human abortion in all 50 states, throughout the entire nine months of pregnancy.

The NRLC has been instrumental in achieving a number of legislative reforms at the national level, including a ban on non-therapeutic experimentation of unborn and newborn babies, a federal conscience clause guaranteeing medical personnel the right to refuse to participate in abortion procedures, and various amendments to appropriations bills which prohibit (or limit) the use of federal funds to subsidize or promote abortions in the United States and overseas.

In addition to maintaining a lobbying presence at the federal level, NRLC serves as a clearinghouse of information for its state affiliates and local chapters, its individual members, the press, and the public.

Source: NRLC website 06n-NRLC on Dec 31, 2006

Ensure access to and funding for contraception.

Kennedy co-sponsored ensuring access to and funding for contraception

A bill to expand access to preventive health care services that help reduce unintended pregnancy, reduce abortions, and improve access to women’s health care. The Congress finds as follows:

Healthy People 2010 sets forth a reduction of unintended pregnancies as an important health objective to achieve over the first decade of the new century.
Although the CDC included family planning in its published list of the Ten Great Public Health Achievements in the 20th Century, the US still has one of the highest rates of unintended pregnancies among industrialized nations.
Each year, 3,000,000 pregnancies, nearly half of all pregnancies, in the US are unintended, and nearly half of unintended pregnancies end in abortion.
In 2004, 34,400,000 women, half of all women of reproductive age, were in need of contraceptive services, and nearly half of those were in need of public support for such care.
The US has the highest rate of infection with sexually transmitted diseases of any industrialized country. 19 million cases impose a tremendous economic burden, as high as $14 billion per year.
Increasing access to family planning services will improve women’s health and reduce the rates of unintended pregnancy, abortion, and infection with sexually transmitted diseases. Contraceptive use saves public health dollars. For every dollar spent to increase funding for family planning programs, $3.80 is saved.
Contraception is basic health care that improves the health of women and children by enabling women to plan and space births.
Women experiencing unintended pregnancy are at greater risk for physical abuse and women having closely spaced births are at greater risk of maternal death.
A child born from an unintended pregnancy is at greater risk of low birth weight, dying in the first year of life, being abused, and not receiving sufficient resources for healthy development.

Martin Salter, Labour MP for Reading West, and Promoter of Dismemberment of Children In Utero. Abortion Supporter.

admin — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:19:19 +0000

This is the man who wants to force abortion on the children of Ireland

News from Precious Life and SPUC relates that MArtin Salter MP and a cohort of Pro Abortion Westminster MPs are still intent on forcing the 1967 Abortion Act on Ireland. Despite massive and continuous resistance to this Act, and to abortion, the forces behind the abortion machine still persist.

Its quite obvious from a little research on Salter, pictured above (sleeping during the debate on the new speaker) and below, that he is probably incapable of an individual thought. One can only presume then that he is the monkey, so who exactly is the organ grinder?

See:

10 / 07 / 2009 – Pro-abortion MPs in Westminster to debate “Abortion law in Northern Ireland”

Pro-abortion MPs in Westminster will hold a debate on “Abortion law in Northern Ireland” on Wednesday 15th July

The ‘Westminster Hall debate’ [1] has been initiated by Labour MP Martin Salter.

Martin Salter recently tabled an ‘Early Day Motion’ [2] regarding abortion law in Northern Ireland, where he welcomed the screening at Westminster of an abortion propaganda film funded by the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) – the largest promoter of abortion in the world – and the FPA – a member of IPPF

Commenting on Martin Salter’s motion and debate, the Director of Precious Life, Bernadette Smyth said “Less than a week ago, thousands, including people from all across Northern Ireland, marched in the Rally for Life in Dublin to show their opposition to abortion. Last October, thousands of people attended our Rally For Life in Belfast to stand united with our politicians and churches in opposing abortion. Northern Ireland is constantly sending out a clear message that we do not want abortion imposed on us from Westminster. We want our unborn children and their mothers to remain protected from abortion.

She added, “It‘s no coincidence that this debate will take place in the week that is the traditional holiday period in Northern Ireland. I believe these pro-abortion MPs deliberately chose this time so as to minimise the possibility of participation by Northern Ireland’s pro-life MPs.”

Bernadette Smyth concluded, “These pro-abortion MPs are still arrogantly ignoring the clear pro-life message from our politicians, church leaders, and our people. Once again, my message to Martin Salter and his abortion cohorts is `butt out` of Northern Ireland and stop interfering in our laws that protect our unborn children.”

Pro-life Leaders Face Death Threats, Require Protection from Abortion Rights Radicals

admin — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:12:17 +0000

Lifesite carries the story of leading prolife American activists who have recieved death threats after the Tiller killing.

Frankly, this is not surprising given the death instinct of pro abortion activists. However the media must take much of the blame for its coverage of the tiller killing. Before motive or any fact was ascertained the media was reporting that the murderer was a “pro lifer”. Usually when someone is murdered (unless he is an unborn child) there is a an investigation before comment is made on the motivation of the killer. Sometimes, although the media is not often aware of this, there is also something called a “right to jury trial” and a presumption of “innocence untill proven guilty”.

To date no one really knows why the perpetrator of Tiller’s killing acted, if he was insane or what exactly was his motivation. I suppose the presumption that Tiller was murdered because he was a late term abortionist is the most credible one, still it’s strange that the pro aborts are so in unison on this being a credible motive.

Stop the Monkey Business! The Real Face of the Revolution.

admin — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:13:09 +0000

THe Real Face of the Revolution.

To our enemy! We resist you in the face!

admin — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:20:07 +0000

Click on image for details of Rosary Crusade.

Hat tip to: Catholic Tradition

Catholics Cannot Vote For Pro Abortion Bairbre de Brun as MEP.

admin — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:34:02 +0000

Mrs Bairbre de Brun is standing as the Sinn Fein candidate for the European Parliament. However , like her colleague, Mrs Mary Lou McDonald, Mrs de Brun is a supporter of abortion rights.

In the most recent example of this Mrs de Brun voted for extensive abortion rights, packaged in the term “Reproductive Rights” in the far reaching proposals of the Catonia Report.

Mrs de Brun who supports abortion rights. Click here to see the sort of proceedures that Mrs de Brun has voted in favour of.

A potential victim of abortion rights.

The Pope has spoken out against Catholic politicians who support abortion. They sould not recieve Holy Communion and they may be excommunicted.

Catholics should inform themselves of their politicians views BEFORE voting. It is our duty. Even if we agree with other issues which the politician stands for we should not and cannot in moral conscience vote for someone who will promote and support the violation and dismemberment of innocent life. It is a mortal sin and we will all be judged.

Precious Life have put together a voting guide on who is pro life and who is pro abortion. Check this and ask questions before casting your vote.

From Catholic Morality

III What are the duties of government and legislators towards the innocent and especially towards the unborn?

“Governments and legislatures must remember that it is the duty of public authority to protect the lives of the innocent by appropriate laws and penalties, especially when those whose lives are attacked and endangered are unable to protect themselves, as is particularly the case with infants in their mother’s womb. If the State authorities not only fail to protect these little ones but by their laws and decrees, suffer them to be killed, and even deliver them into vourthe hands of doctors and others for that purpose, let them remember that God is the Judge and Avenger of the innocent blood that cries from earth to heaven.” Pius XI, Encyclical ‘Casti Connubii,’ Dec. 31, 1930. (32)

Abortionist Murdered

admin — Sun, 31 May 2009 22:21:36 +0000

Tiller, late term abortionist, was shot dead in church.

I am sure the perpetrator of this murder will face justice. Today Mr Tiller will also face justice. May God have mercy on his soul.

“I have held thee in the palm of my hand” Issiah

Although many groups, pro abortion and pro life have condemed this killing no facts are yet known about the motive. The man being held is not a member of a pro life group.

In a just society Tiller would have been tried long ago for his barbaric crimes against unborn children and recieved the death penalty.

We do not live in a just society and the scandal of abortion and all ascociated violence continues.

Anencephalic Baby Thriving. Follow the story on mothers blog….

admin — Sat, 23 May 2009 00:18:43 +0000

Here is a lovely story.

Faith has anencephaly but has been astounding doctors and confounding medical prognosis since birth.

http://babyfaithhope.blogspot.com/

May God Bless this little child.

The most important thing for any little baby, especially ones who are ill or have a short life expectancy is that they be baptised.

This is the greatest gift we can give our children, even those who are only with us a short time. We can be assured they will then enter Heaven and be with the Blessed Lord and Our Lady. Also we can pray to them and look forward to seeing them again. A great comfort.

The Feast of The Ascension.

admin — Thu, 21 May 2009 21:31:59 +0000

Christ showed us by His Ascension to Heaven the way. Follow Him.

Why did God make me?

To know Him, Love Him and Serve Him in this world and to be happy with Him forever in the next. (Penny Catechism)

Socialist Anti Catholic Journalist Suzanne Breen Calls for the Catholic Church to be “Run out of town” after abuse report.

admin — Thu, 21 May 2009 06:58:03 +0000

Breen rants on UTV News that the Pope is not welcome in Ireland.

Following the release of a report by a Commission into abuse in Catholic and Irish State Institutions the media has whipped up a frenzy of anti Catholic sentiments culminating last night in the journalist, Suzanne Breen, calling for our Church to be “run out of town.”

In a scene reminiscent of the anti clerical attacks on the Church in previous centuries, (Spain, France, Ireland) the UTV news descended into farce as two well known left wing journalists, including Breen, vented their spleen against the Church in the wake of the commission’s report which states that children were abused in institutions run by the Catholic Church in Ireland. Breen concluded by stating that the Pope would not be welcome in Ireland after the anouncement of a possible Papal visit.

Catholic priest and writer, the late Father Malichi Martin, was correct in fortelling that the world would use the scandal of abuse in the Church unleashed by the novelties of Vatican 11 as a whip to lash the Church.

We are to believe, if we listen to the news that every Priest, Nun, Bishop and infact the whole Church and all its institutions including Catholic lay people are to blame for this abuse. As pictures of Our Lord crucified and Our Lady weeping were flashed across TV screens to the sound of church music a plaitiff voice recited a litany of abuse including “strict discipline” and “authoritarian regimes” alongsinde sexual abuse.

The criminal activity of some of the clergy in the last forty years since Vatican 11 will now be used to try and crush the Church in Ireland once again. Church detractors who have long since awaited this moment will wish us to feel collective guilt for the actions of some members of the clergy. However the commission of a sin or a crime is a matter for the individual. We are not expected to go into the confessional and confess the sins of others. We are only guilty of those sins we ourselves commit.

Why no prosecutions?

We learn from the secular news that there are however to be no prosecutions. Anyone abusing children , especially those who commit sexual assaults on children should be prosecuted. The commission who wrote the report cannot restrict the proper process of the law. If there is evidence of the sort of criminal abuse listed in the news reports then the victims should take this to the police, whatever the report states. These matters and allegations should be aired in public courts where we can see the truth and the evidence of exactly what went on.

In the meantime it suits the media that no formal prosecutions will happen. They can pretend that as one journalist said last night “35 thousand poor souls” were affected by this abuse. They can also continue to lash the whole Church for the acts of some of its members.

Time for Conscilliar Church to admit complete failure.

Will the concilliar Church now take action and realise the complete failure of Vatican 11? Will they in any way be able to console those who as children who were subjected to sexual assaults by rogue priests? The moderinst in the Church have had a free hand and have led us into this diabolical state. Innocent children have suffered unspeakable crimes at the hands of people who would never have been allowed near a seminary in previous days. The Church is weak and the attack will continue.

Turn back to the Traditional Church

In the meantime many Catholics worldwide have already seen the corruption of Vatican 11 and have turned back to Tradition. We pray for the Pope to consecrate Russia and the defeat of all communists within and outside the Church.

The Remnant On the Notre Dame Scandal..

admin — Wed, 20 May 2009 15:52:49 +0000

This article was sent to Hidden Ireland and is from The Remnant. A traditional Catholic paper.

The Wintertime of Vatican II
Notre Dame’s Scandal in Perspective

Michael J. Matt

Editor, The Remnant

(Posted 05/19/09 www.RemnantNewspaper.com) I write these words on May 17, 2009—a day that will surely go down in infamy in the annals of the once mighty Catholic Church in America. The springtime of Vatican II has obviously given way to darkest winter when Our Lady’s University in South Bend, Indiana, selects an ardently pro-abortion, pro stem-cell research, pro homosexual unions socialist for its commencement speaker. But this whole, sorry incident is indicative of a much greater catastrophe at the very heart of the Catholic Church.

Even after Archbishop Raymond Burke, a top ranking Vatican official, as well as nearly one hundred American bishops had objected to the public scandal at Notre Dame, President Barack Obama was still welcomed on campus where just the day before, priests had been dragged away in handcuffs for protesting the outrage. “Why is Notre Dame arresting Catholic priests”, Fr. Norman Weslin had asked campus police, “merely for trying to stop the killing of a little baby?” Why indeed! “Ave, Ave, Ave Maria,” the 80-year-old priest sang out as police shackled him like a common criminal.

Poor Father Weslin should have known that precious few at Notre Dame have the capacity to understand his words anymore. The Golden Domers have become sophisticated, and a ‘Hail Mary’ is a long pass in a football game!

Not only did Obama deliver the commencement address but he was interrupted by applause no less than 20 times. Afterwards, the most pro-abortion president in U.S. history was presented with an honorary degree by the president of Notre Dame, a ‘Catholic’ priest.

Clearly, the fort has been betrayed.

It was indeed wonderful to see so many American bishops finally objecting to something, but I suspect even most of them would admit that their protest was too little, too late. Forty years ago? Sure! Today? Not on your life! Modern bishops are supposed to be nice guys, ever ready for dialogue, big sports fans, maybe even pro-life. But in all too many dioceses, Sister Mary Feminist runs the chancery and Father Phil Donahue heads up the university. That’s just the way it is; and that’s the way it’s been for quite some time.

As Katie Walker pointed out in her column for the American Life League last week, this scandal is not without precedent. There’s an actual “timeline of dissent from Catholic teaching”, in fact, that “conservative” fans of the Fighting Irish have chosen to ignore for far too long. After all, Notre Dame has one hell of a football program!

Never mind that in 1976 pro-abortion politician Walter Mondale was guest speaker at Notre Dame. No one seriously objected even when pro-abort Gov. Mario Cuomo spoke at the commencement at Notre Dame in 1984. In 1987, Miss Walker reminds her readers, theology professor Fr. Richard McCormick avowed support for in vitro fertilization at Notre Dame. In 1987 Notre Dame joined Fordham University, Boston College and Georgetown University in promoting condoms in defiance of Church teaching. In 1992 ND graduation ceremonies featured pro-abortion Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan. In 1995-96 the Core Council for Gay and Lesbian Students formed at Notre Dame. From 2002 through 2008 the pornographic Vagina Monologues was performed on campus at Notre Dame despite opposition from Bishop John D’Arcy and Catholic bishops across the country. In 2004 the Queer Film Festival took place at Notre Dame. In 2006 ND’s commencement speaker was none other than President Mary McAleese of Ireland—a supporter of women’s ordination who was nevertheless given an honorary degree by Notre Dame. In 2006 Fr. Richard McBrien argued that it was morally justified to remove Terry Schiavo’s feeding tube.

Our Lady’s University? Please!

So let’s not be too hard on old Barack Obama—or Barry Soetero, or whoever he is—for this one. He is who he is, but it’s the ‘Catholics’ in charge of Notre Dame who should have been excommunicated years ago. These de facto apostates are the disease; commencement speaker Obama is a mere symptom.

And yet the Holy Father was here in America just one year ago speaking to educators from more than 200 Catholic colleges and universities in the U.S.—including Notre Dame. On that occasion he encouraged Catholic educators to “bear witness to hope. Nourish your witness with prayer. Account for the hope that characterizes your lives (cf. 1 Pet 3:15) by living the truth which you propose to your students. Help them to know and love the One you have encountered, whose truth and goodness you have experienced with joy.”

In light of today’s scandal at Notre Dame perhaps it would have been more advantageous to the Church in America had the Holy Father stayed in Rome last year and drawn up the necessary decrees of excommunication for half the ‘Catholic’ politicians in this country and most of the ‘Catholic’ university heads—starting, of course, with Father John Jenkins of Notre Dame!

What can be said about the modern Catholic Church when her own priests and bishops no longer pay the slightest heed to the words of the Holy Father, even when he travels all the way from Rome to speak to them? No wonder he’s so often reduced to making polite requests for toleration of Church teaching! Since Vatican II even the Roman Pontiffs have lost the authority to command even in the Church, much less outside of her walls. Collegiality has seen to it that they’re all equal, these shepherds of ours—so equal, in fact, that no one seems to be in charge. As was displayed today at Notre Dame University, the leadership of the Catholic Church is in near total disarray.

Little apostates like John Jenkins have no fear of disciplinary action from their superiors even when making it clear to the Holy Father himself that they will not serve. Notre Dame is still ‘Catholic’, of course!, and will go on being ‘Catholic’ for years to come. Mustn’t let a little apostasy change that!

Meanwhile, the fans of the Fighting Irish will likely continue to express outrage over the Pope’s recent concessions to the “schismatic” Society of St. Pius X. Real schism will be tolerated while the SSPX is blasted to kingdom come—even after the Pope himself lifted the excommunications of its bishops. When there cease to be consequences for schism in the Church, and when silence replaces the anathema even in the face of apostasy, should any of us be surprised when the few faithful Catholics left in America are carted off in handcuffs, ridiculed as “schismatics” or charged as “enemies of the state”?

As the Bride of Christ was scheduled to be scourged symbolically at Notre Dame, our Pope was in Israel, where he was expected to apologize—yet again—for all the “sins” of the Church in the past. He was expected to grovel. He was expected to join in the scourging of the Bride of Christ. And when he came up short of those expectations, he was ridiculed in the press. Citing Benedict’s alleged membership in the Hitler Youth, Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin berated the pope on Israeli Radio over his address at Israel’s Yad Vashem:

In the prayer he slotted into a stone crevice of the remnant of the Roman-era Jewish Temple complex, Pope Benedict mentioned in general terms “the suffering and the pain of all your people throughout the world” and called for peace in the Middle East.

Rivlin said that “with all due respect to the Holy See, we cannot ignore the burden he bears, as a young German who joined the Hitler Youth and as a person who joined Hitler’s army, which was an instrument in the extermination”.

http://in.news.yahoo.com/137/20090512/760/twl-pope-comes-under-criticism-in-israel.html

Pope Benedict’s enemies are legion, and not just outside the Vatican. In the wake of July 7, 2007, one can almost hear the whisperings inside the Vatican: “This has gone far enough! The ‘old man’ must be reined in for his own good and that of the whole Church. We need John Paul III”.

So the papal road shows are becoming all the rage once again. Must keep the Pope busy, busy, busy.

Last year he came to America, and was reduced to practically begging Catholic universities to become Catholic again. Did they listen? Ask Fr. Jenkins!

This year he went to Africa and spoke out against condoms. But while he was on the road, even “the Vatican”—meaning no doubt the Secretary of State—rejected his teaching:

The Pope initially told reporters flying with him to Cameroon that AIDS was “a tragedy that cannot be overcome by money alone, and that cannot be overcome through the distribution of condoms, which even aggravates the problems”. But yesterday the Vatican website published an edited text changing his words to say that the use of condoms “risks” aggravating the problem. Reporters who taped the Italian-language interview said the Pope, who speaks fluent Italian, did not say the word “risks” on Tuesday and he was unequivocal in saying that condoms aggravate the epidemic.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25212024-2703,00.html

In other words, “the Vatican” got caught red handed editing the Pope. If they did it then how many times have they done it before or since?

Incredibly, even the Pope is not necessarily free to follow his own papal directives. Remember back in November of 2006 when the Holy Father made his wishes known (through a letter to the world’s bishops from Cardinal Francis Arinze, the Vatican’s Prefect of the Congregation for the Divine Worship) that the universal Church was to correctly translate ‘pro multis’ as ‘for many’ rather than ‘for all’ in the canon of all vernacular Masses? Whatever happened to that? Even in his own Masses the Holy Father is still using ‘for all’.

The Pope who is evidently “not allowed” to correct errors in the Novus Ordo translations is also expected to grovel before non-Catholics the world over. “The good will be martyred, the Holy Father will have much to suffer, various nations will be annihilated,” Our Lady of Fatima predicted. Well, here we are.

At the Church of the Annunciation in the Holy Land last week, an interreligious meeting was held between Catholics, Druzians, Jews, and Muslims. The Pope was present. The usual silly season nonsense about the world’s “great religions” being on the same road together, trying to “discover the truth” (as though the Truth hadn’t already been discovered two thousand and nine years ago!) was spouted by archbishops, rabbis and sheiks alike.

Muslims spoke with great pathos about getting along with the followers of “Jesus and the other great prophets”; the Holy Father encouraged those present to “continue exercising mutual respect as you work to ease tensions concerning places of worship, thus assuring a serene environment for prayer and reflection here and throughout Galilee.” And, all at once, a visibly agitated rabbi commandeered the podium at the end of the meeting and insisted that the representatives of the world’s “great religions” needed to pray together right then and there. “Shalom! Salaam! Lord, grant us peace! Dona Nobis Pacem!” he intoned, gesticulating around the room for all to join together in the singing—and praying?—of his little theological pop song.

On and on it went, “Shalom! Salaam! Lord, Grant us peace! Dona Nobis Pacem,” until finally the Pope began grinning almost embarrassedly. By the end of it, however, he was induced to hold hands with rabbis and sheiks, as the singer warbled on and on “Shalom! Salaam! Lord, Grant us peace! Dona Nobis Pacem.” All that was missing was a cameo from Oprah Winfrey!

As the world falls deeper and deeper into chaos and confusion one can’t help but wonder what the point of all this is anymore. Why must Christians, Jews and Muslims living in the real world endure such childish displays of hammed-up emotionalism? Are we actually to believe that folks in Gaza, Jerusalem, Bagdad or South Bend gave two hoots about that photo-op and the never ending “Shalom! Salaam! Lord, Grant us peace! Dona Nobis Pacem”?

The partition wall that rips through the heart of the Holy Land isn’t going anywhere. With Gaza still hemorrhaging, the Holy Land is likely to remain the Holy Landing Zone. Nothing will change despite “Shalom! Salaam! Lord, Grant us peace! Dona Nobis Pacem”. So, what’s the point, other than to parade the apparent surrender of the human element of the Catholic Church—the only church ever to claim to be the only Church—before the whole world.

Far be it from us to dictate to the Holy Father what needs to be done, but we have now seen the abomination of Barack Obama standing in the holy place, telling the Catholic world that ‘little differences’ over partial-birth abortion should be laid on the altar of the God of Toleration. What is the answer to this abomination of desolation? “Shalom! Salaam! Lord, Grant us peace! Dona Nobis Pacem”? Please!

If people who still have the capacity for rational thought would take President Obama’s glib-tongued, tele-prompted commencement address at Notre Dame and substitute the word “slavery” or “wife-beating” for “abortion,” they would realize just how intolerant Mr. Tolerance is—and just how intolerant our “religiously neutral” Western republics are. Shall we dialogue about “our differences” and look for “common ground,” Mr. President, when it comes to slavery and wife-beating.

But the mass murder of unborn children has become a “dialogue point” at Notre Dame University, a matter on which reasonable people—even reasonable priests!—can agree to disagree, while the mass murder continues. That is the message sent by the Catholic Church in America to the whole world. That is the ultimate scandal. That is the white flag of surrender signaling the arrival of the winter of Vatican II.

Setting aside whatever positive developments may have transpired while the Holy Father was in the Holy Land (the plight of the Palestinians, for example, was given more media attention during his short visit than in the past five years), we humbly beg the Holy Father to usher in true Catholic restoration by staying in Rome and governing the Church from now on. Benedict did more for souls, Catholic identity, and world peace on July 7, 2007, than all the inter-religious meetings and papal globetrotting combined. And it was Summorum Pontificum, let’s not forget, that earned him the wrath of the world.

Before he left the Holy Land and after he’d been ridiculed in the press for not apologizing quite profusely enough for his youth, the “crimes” of his Church and the sheer dunderheadedness of his predecessors, the Holy Father delivered a sermon on his final day in the Holy Land which justified the hope faithful Catholics throughout the world have in him:

Following in the footsteps of the Apostle, I wish to proclaim anew, to the men and women of our time, the Church’s firm faith that Jesus Christ “was crucified, died and was buried”, and that “on the third day he rose from the dead”. Exalted at the right hand of the Father, he has sent us his Spirit for the forgiveness of sins. Apart from him, whom God has made Lord and Christ, “there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we are to be saved” (Acts 4:12).

Standing in this holy place, and pondering that wondrous event, how can we not be “cut to the heart” (Acts 2:37), like those who first heard Peter’s preaching on the day of Pentecost?

Here Christ died and rose, never to die again. Here the history of humanity was decisively changed. The long reign of sin and death was shattered by the triumph of obedience and life; the wood of the Cross lay bare the truth about good and evil; God’s judgment was passed on this world and the grace of the Holy Spirit was poured out upon humanity. Here Christ, the new Adam, taught us that evil never has the last word, that love is stronger than death, that our future, and the future of all humanity, lies in the hands of a faithful and provident God.

Pray earnestly for Pope Benedict. Is he conflicted to some extent? It would seem so, as are we all. But powerful forces inside the Vatican and out are directing their considerable energies to the refashioning of the Holy Father in the spirit of the age. They’re even editing his teachings in order to make them less controversial. It would seem they’ve had enough of his Tradition-friendly reforms and, in the wake of the “last straw”— the Williamson affair—are doing all in their power to stop him from taking even one more step in the direction of Tradition.

Faithful Catholics must not bury their heads in the sand. The Church in the modern world does not need a rock star in Peter’s chair. She needs a priest, a holy man, perhaps even a martyr if there is to be any hope of true restoration.

The Holy Father is not a young man. We must pray that he resists the wolves that surround him, that he stays in Rome, that he governs his Church, and that at long last he recognizes the tragic—but increasingly obvious!—failure of the Second Vatican Council to usher in a new springtime for the Church and “contemporary man.”

What happened this day at Notre Dame proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that the springtime of Vatican II has never materialized, and that the papal hope for such a springtime was perhaps the most inexplicable delusion in human history. Darkness has covered the earth and winter’s frozen embrace paralyzes the Church—in America and throughout the whole world.

God save the Pope.

Excellent Article On Obama at Notre Dame from Catholic Family News

admin — Tue, 19 May 2009 21:20:15 +0000

From Catholic Family News

Abortionist-in-Chief at Notre Dame

Obama, Notre Dame
and the Counter-Syllabus

by John Vennari

The grand moment finally arrived on May 17 when Notre Dame University President Father John Jenkins introduced Obama to the graduates. Barack turned on the charm and won them, hands down.
Obama, falsely presenting himself as the reasonable man in the middle, called for fair-mindedness. He urged a vigorous debate on the abortion issue, as if there could legitimately be two opposing views to God’s Commandment “Thou Shalt Not Kill”. Our Lord clearly said, “He who is not with Me is against Me.” Obama corrects Our Lord, warning Christ not to “reduce differing views to caricature”.
Obama cast himself as above the fray, counseling contenders on each side how to conduct the discussion with civility. This coming from one of the world’s most rabidly pro-abortion (and pro-homosexual) politicians was the height of hubris, hypocrisy and audacity. The graduates, blinded by idol worship and lack of Catholic formation, chanted “Yes We Can! Yes We Can!”. Empty slogans from empty minds.
Obama spoke the language of the post-Conciliar liberal Catholic: dialogue, common-ground, save the planet, Cardinal Bernardin a “saintly man”, the “golden rule” that runs through religions, and he was applauded by graduates of the premiere bastion of liberal Catholicism. He conformed perfectly to the de-educated monsters who are now the faculty and majority of graduates at Notre Dame.
Yet perhaps we should not be too censorious of the students, who have been betrayed by their Catholic leaders.
The scandal at Notre Dame is the effect of the diabolic disorientation of the upper hierarchy now the norm in the Church due to the Second Vatican Council. One cannot praise the Council as the “counter-syllabus” it truly was, and then complain of the disastrous effect that such a reverse necessarily produces.
This Modernist reverse encompasses the destruction of sound philosophy, the perversion of doctrine and the corruption of moral theology.[1] Anarchy now reigns to the point that the average Catholic university is a destroyer of the Faith rather than its guardian and advocate.
In 1960, when neo-Modernism was rising to the crescendo that would be the Council, the eminent American theologian Msgr. Joseph Clifford Fenton warned, “No one has ever been as well placed to harm the true Church and to counteract its essential work as a priest in good standing. If such a man, by his preaching, his teaching, or his writing, actually sets forth the kind of teaching condemned in the anti- Modernist documents Lamentabile sane exitu and Pascendi dominici gregis, or if he works to discredit the loyal defenders of Catholic dogma without receiving any repudiation or reproof from those to whom the apostolic deposit of divine revelation has been entrusted, the Catholic people are in grave danger of being deceived.” [2]
In the name of the Council’s aggiornamento, which effectively advanced the Modernist principle that a portion of Catholic doctrine can change over time,[3] priests and bishops have propounded teaching condemned by St. Pius X’s anti-Modernist documents, and have discredited loyal defenders of Catholic dogma. These priests and bishops have received no “repudiation or reproof from those to whom the apostolic deposit of divine revelation has been entrusted.”
The destruction of the Faith has taken place, and continues, by “priests in good standing”.
Thus, what the clear-sighted Msgr. Fenton predicted in 1960 has come to pass, though he may not have envisioned the massive number now deceived. Obama was enthroned in the once-holy place of Notre Dame because Modernism has been enthroned in the highest echelons of the Church for more than forty years, due to the Second Vatican Council.
The liberal Cardinal Suenens praised the Council as the “French Revolution of the Church”, and the second generation of that revolution has just graduated from Notre Dame chanting “Yes We Can!” to one of the most anti-Christ leaders on the planet.

Notes:

[1] Quick examples: In the realm of philosophy, Vatican II is the culmination of the movement of the anti-Thomist “New Theology” going on at least since the 1930s, and championed by liberal theologians such as Fathers Rahner, Chenu, Congar, Boulliard von Balthasar, de Lubac, and Ratzinger, all of whom (with the exception of van Balthasar and perhaps Boullliard) were the most influential periti at Vatican II. The proponents of the “New Theology” held that modern philosophical methods more relevant to “modern man” should replace scholasticism/Thomism as the basis of theology. This is reflected in the deliberate absence of scholastic language in the documents of Vatican II, and in the disappearance of scholasticism/Thomism as the backbone of philosophical formation in Catholic seminaries and universities. In the realm of doctrine, Cardinal’s Ratzinger’s praise of Vatican II as a “counter-syllabus [of Pius IX]” suffices for one of the various examples that could be sited. In the realm of morals, we saw the “equalization of the ends of marriage” that occurred in Paragraph 50 of Guadium et spes, a development lauded by the Protestant Observer Robert McAfee Brown. This part of Guadium et spes gave the impression that the Church no longer teaches the begetting and education of children as the primary end of marriage. This illicit twist is one of the main factors that launched the so-called “birth-control” debate inside the Church, and opened the door for corrupt moral “theologians” – all who continued their careers as “priests in good standing” — to justify all sorts of immoral and deviant sexual behavior, and to teach this “new approach” to college students.

[2] “Sacrorum Antistitum and the Background of the Oath Against Modernism,” Msgr. Joseph Clifford Fenton, The American Ecclesiastical Review, October, 1960, p.246.

[3] Shortly after the Council, the anti-Modernist Oath was abolished. Our Church leaders who understood the full nature of Vatican II and its consequences were obviously aware they could not keep to the Council’s new direction, and simultaneously fulfill their solemn Oath before God (in the Oath Against Modernism) to teach the faith “in the same meaning and in the same explanation” as the Church has always held. Yet whether someone takes the Oath Against Modernism or not, Vatican Council I teaches infallibly the duty of the Catholic to hold to Catjholic doctrine “in one and the same doctrine, one in the same sense, and one in the same judgment:” as the Church always taught throughout the centuries. (Dei Filius, Vatican I). It is the nature of objective truth itself.

Posted May 19, 2009
Catholic Family News
MPO Box 743 * Niagara Falls, NY 14302
905-871-6292

Pope refers to Fatima Apparitions on Palestine trip: Says Our Lady’s words: “in the end my Immaculate Heart will triumph”

admin — Tue, 19 May 2009 20:09:44 +0000

On 13th May, the aniversary of the Fatima apparitions the Pope made reference to Our Lady of Fatima in a speech at the Caritas Baby Hospital Bethlehem.

The international media will have missed the importance of this, but according to one traditional Catholic priest, this is the first time any Pope since Vatican 11 has publically referred to the words of Our Lady of Fatima to the three shepherd children.

Regarding Fatima the Pope said:

On this Feast of Our Lady of Fatima, I would like to conclude by invoking Mary’s intercession as I impart my Apostolic Blessing to the children and all of you. Let us pray:

Mary, Health of the Sick, Refuge of Sinners, Mother of the Redeemer: we join the many generations who have called you “Blessed”. Listen to your children as we call upon your name. You promised the three children of Fatima that “in the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph”. May it be so! May love triumph over hatred, solidarity over division, and peace over every form of violence! May the love you bore your Son teach us to love God with all our heart, strength and soul. May the Almighty show us his mercy, strengthen us with his power, and fill us with every good thing (cf. Lk 1:46-56). We ask your Son Jesus to bless these children and all children who suffer throughout the world. May they receive health of body, strength of mind, and peace of soul. But most of all, may they know that they are loved with a love which knows no bounds or limits: the love of Christ which surpasses all understanding (cf. Eph 3:19). Amen.

To Catholics whis is a wonderful sign, especially from a concilliar Pope. Having released the Moto Proprio and then lifted the “excommunications” of the Bishops of the Society of St Pius X, we now continue with the Rosary Crusade to implore the Blessed Virgin to intercede that this Pope may fulfill her wish as dictated at Fatima and consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.