Hidden Ireland

Entries from September 2007

Why the General Medical Council of the UK Cannot Be Trusted To Issue Guidelines.

September 29, 2007 · Leave a Comment

The latest guidence to come from the GMC states that children should be treated without the knowladge of their parent regargding sexual “health” issues. According to the guidelines this would include referring a girl for an abortion without her parents knowladge. The Press Association report states:

“Children should have confidential access to contraception and abortion and more involvement in their NHS treatment, new guidelines claim. Doctors can provide sexual health advice and treatment to under-16s provided they understand the implications, the guide from the General Medical Council (GMC) said.”

Morality and decency aside. What are the legal implications from such loosely drafted and inept guidelines?

The phrase “provided they understand the implications” is interesting. It obviously had to be inserted because it is so obvious that a minor is not a responsible persong in the way and adult is deemed to be.

Following from this then, any doctor may deem a child presenting with a contraceptive request or an abortion request, not to “understand the implications“, and therefore contact the childs parents or legal guardian.

As the perception of anothers capacity is relative, there is no way that it can be said that it would be wrong, for instance, for a particular doctor to deem that all his patients who are children are incapable of “undestanding the implications” of such treatment. In fact it could be said that this would be the normal view of most people.

Further, if a doctor deems me, a 13 year old , to be capable of “understanding the implications” of such treatment, and when I am 20 I realise that I didn’t, after all understand these implications, who do I sue? Or in this case is there any one I cannot sue! We all know, the law of Tort is a marvelous beast, adaptable and insatiable at all times.

It is, of course, my own opinion, but it might be best practice for a doctor, with regard to the above, to assume that all children cannot “understand the implications” of complex medical treatment. However, I would of course not advise that anyone should follow this advice unless they “understand the implications”!

Categories: Abortion · Catholic · Contraception · Legal/Medical · Media · News · Opinion

Call For People To Back Pro Life MLAs Against Abortion In Northern Ireland.

September 26, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Precious Life have issued a massive advertising campaign to ask people of the North of Ireland to back Jeffrey Donaldson and Iris Robinsons’ motion to stop Abortion Guidelines from being enacted by the Department of Health in the North.

The motion, which is to be tabled at any time will read:

“That this Assembly opposes the introduction of the proposed guidelines n the termination of pregnancy in Northern Ireland; believes that the guidelines are flawed; and calls on the Minister of Health, Socila Services and Public Safelty to abandon any attempt to make abortion more widely available in Northern Ireland.” 

Precious Life are aking that the people of this country require that their representatives stand aginst any attempt on the lives of unborn children and vote in favour of this motion.

It s understod that Precious Life had commissioned a Barrister to write a “Breifing Paper” underlining the Criminal Legal position regarding these proposed guidelines. This paper has been issued to all the MLAs in the North so that they are all aware of the threat to the child posed in the guidelines.

Thie Briefing Paper gives a blow by blow accout of what to expect if the guidelines are issued in their present form. Among one of the most condemning factors is the following:
 “Section 25(2) of the Criminal Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 1945 is omitted. This
section of the Act gives a statutory presumption that all babies of 28 weeks gestation are “capable of being born alive” ………………..

 How can the medical profession be expected to trust this guidance when an error of such magnitude has been made in a fundamental principle of the law? What are the implications for the rest of the commentary when this erroneous advice has been given?
It should not be forgotten that Child Destruction carries a maximum life sentence.

 This error alone should justify the abandonment of these Guidelines.” (Briefing Paper)

Another very frightening aspect of the guidelines is that they promote the concept of forced abortion:
 ”Section 2.13 of the Guidelines – under the heading “Consent” – provides that
underage girls may be forced to have an abortion against their will. It states

 “2.13 The Department …provides guidance on the law relating to consent. Practitioners are strongly advised to read this guidance before carrying out any termination procedure …These chapters explain … the circumstances in which it may be appropriate to apply to the court to over-ride the refusal of consent by a young person.” 

The case law used DOES NOT allow for abortion without consent. In the cases cited in the Guidelines the women consented, the issue was legality. There is no legal foundation for forcing an abortion on a woman.” (Briefing Paper)

Altogether this analysis of the guidelines provides a 24 point reason why these guidelines are dangeroud and should not be tolerated. Precious Life can be contacted on 02890278484 for postcards which you can use to support their campaign by letting the Assembly members know your feelings.

For the BBC News report on this story CLICK HERE.  

Categories: Abortion · Legal/Medical · Media · News

1000 British Babies A Year Die Needlessly. Britain Has One Of Highest Rates Of Stillbirth In Western Europe.

September 25, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Professor Jason Gardosi, Director of the Perinatal Institute in Birmingham states that at least a quarter of the 4,000 stillbirths which happen every year in Britain could be avoided.

If proper ante natal care was given to pregnant women and properly skilled staff wre treating mothers, then many of these tradgedies would not happen.

The New President of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists warned that there are not enough Consultants and midwives to ensure the safety of mothers and babies.

Is it likely that much of a fuss will be made about these findings in the media and from “the powers that be”? No, not likely. Wouldn’t suit the feminists would it.

In Britain over 200,000 babies a year are killed deliberately before they are born and its called ”the right to choose”. Is it surprising that the medical system which perpetrates this is incompetant?

Categories: Abortion · Legal/Medical · News

Vatican Bodyguards Rough Up Socci and Paolini.

September 24, 2007 · 1 Comment

An amazing story on CFN by John Vennari describes an incident between two journalists and Vatican body guards who became violent in order to keep the lid on the Third Secret of Fatima………

“As we go to press, this story comes in from our contact in Rome who received the information first-hand from Socci and Paolini…………………………………..”(Click Here for full story)

Categories: Catholic

Female Judge Ridicules Chinese Asylum Seeker For Crying Over Forced Abortion And Slugger O’Toole Blogger Discusses “Suicide by Birth”

September 21, 2007 · 2 Comments

It is shocking to hear, but it is reported that an American female judge actually ridiculed a Chinese man who was seeking asylum from China because he cried when recalling how his wife was subjected to a forced abortion of her second child. The judge was apparently annoyed at the mans show of emotion and called him to order for his conduct.

Thankfully this judge was removed from the case and a later court reversed her refusal to grant asylum.

The full story can be seen here. (Click Here)

It strikes me that this woman was annoyed because “abortion” is not supposed to upset anyone, in other words the man’s emotion at the death of his child and the torture his wife suffered challenged the politically correct attitude that abortion is not a crime against humanity. So what if you are forced into it…….. Whats the big deal?

The first time I came across this attitude was quite recently on the blog “Slugger OToole“.

One of the regular posters on Slugger supports forced abortion and isn’t ashamed to say so, despite the fact that this is quite clearly illegal in this state and abhorant to most people. Here’s what this forced abortion supporter had to say:

“As to forced abortions? Well, same as I said with the blood transfusions for Jehovah witnesses, or fanatics that believe prayer cures illness. There are times when it may be seen to be cruel to force treatment, but if there is a lack of capacity or other circumstances and a clear risk to the life of the mother, well yes, the foetus gets aborted.

Like ..So what???

And if you are consoling yourself by imagining that this person is just an inconsequential nutter I have worse news, the blogger states the following about themselves:

“You’re right about my CV. I nursed in Ireland and many states on the East Coast and south of America. I also nursed in Ireland before becoming involved in social services and the voluntary sector. I still work in that sector, but lecture in social science. “

EEEEEK!

If you read the thread through on Slugger (from the bottom of the first page to the bottom of the second page) you will find that this person has ziltch knowledge of the law and a very unhealthy interest in promoting abortion.

See for an example the wonderfull statement:

“..as the law stands, and as the guidelines make clear, her wish to commit ‘suicide by birth’ can indeed by over ridden.”

Dont send your daughter to university Mrs McGrath, especially if she’s thinking of doing Social Science………

Categories: Abortion · Media · News · Opinion

Steven Nolan Covers Abortion Guidelines Issue.

September 19, 2007 · Leave a Comment

On the Steven Nolan show this morning (click here) was MLA Jeffrey Donaldson explaining that he and Iris Robinson were tableing a motion before Stormont to stop the abortion guidelines being introduced.

Congratulations to Nolan for covering this matter!

The Department of Health have tried to keep this issue quite, refusing to release the Draft Abortion Guidelines for public consultation, even though abortion is one thing on which the devided people of this country agree on

Also on the show was Greta Horgan of the pro abortion movement. She accepted what Mr Donaldson said, that “it their totality these guidelines would increase abortion in Northern Ireland.”

She lamented that these guidelines would not however go far enough. Horgan is a prolific supporter of abortion on demand.

Hidden Ireland has reported on these guidelines before see:

http://hiddenireland.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/partial-birth-abortion-may-soon-be-a-reality-in-northern-ireland/

 http://hiddenireland.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/sleight-of-hand-how-to-change-the-law-without-touching-the-law/

MORE ON THIS ISSUE TO COME………………………….

Categories: Abortion · Legal/Medical · Media · News

Madeleine McCann and The Monsters of the Media. A Cautionary Tale.

September 15, 2007 · Leave a Comment

It is something of an emotional and physical shock to have seen the vast and vitriolic coverage of the story of little Madeleine McCann who was snatched from her parents holiday appartment in Portugal in May.

This heartrending tale turned from a search for a little girl who was taken whilst sleeping, to an unmitigated assault on her parents, right to the point where they are now being accused of murdering her themselves, hiding the body and then disposing of her in an unknown grave.

It is virtually impossible to deal with the kind of accusations which are being made in some of the British press. They are so off the wall, so uniformed and so without reason. Newsagents shelves everywhere have turned into Little Shops of Horror as the ensuing debacle goes on. Instead of having to avert ones eyes from the usual steady stream of visual filth regularly on display, one is reeling at the latest concoction of rumour and calumny presented as a news story and coupled with a photograph of the hounded and fractured Mrs McCann.

For the record, I do not believe for one instant that the McCanns had anything to do with the disappearance of their child. It is beyond reason to suggest otherwise. As a criminal lawyer, I can see plainly that the so called “evidence” amounts to nothing (even this is just rumour of evidence and not fact). Forensic evidence does not provide conclusions or solutions, this is left to the reasoning process of the human mind.  To be frank they wouldn’t even be able to frame an innocent Irish man with what they (dont) have against the McCanns.

We lawyers all know of the failings of DNA evidence. A weakness that the press seems determined to ignore. I can remember being addressed by Crown Counsel whilst still a Law student at Grey’s Inn and being told a gruesome story of a case of murder which he had successfully prosecuted on forensic evidence, and which at the time had seemed conclusive, but on appeal had proved fatally flawed. He thought it imperative that we always question this sort of evidence. That was a salutory lesson I learned 17 years ago. It was a lesson which came back to haunt me when a similar thing happened in my own practice. The forensic lab “mixed up” samples effectively putting an innocent man at the scene. Fortunately in this case the mistake was discovered before the man was convicted, but unfortunatley not before he had suffered untold mental anguish.

Human error. It’s everywhere. In fact human error is all that is left when God is taken out of the equation. That is what we are left with the flailing minds of the liberal academics. In turn, the acrobatic contortions of reason, for which modern man is so well known, climaxes in a terrible parody of unreason manifested by some in the media.

If Shakespeare said “life is a stage” then this is an arena. The McCanns are, quite literally, the Christians. The press the lions. The public the jeering, hysterical crowd and the madhatters of the editorial world perch like little Caesers drunkenly signaling, “thumbs up” no, wait “thumbs down!”

Of course, there was always a little section of the media prone to crazy speculation, but now it is widespread. Posing as the intellectuals of our day these pundits espouse the news and views with an air of thoughtfulness, and yet their minds must literally be stewed. They cannot follow a single thought through to its natural end. They have no understanding of history or of the nature of man. They have, in short, no faculty for reason. This is because the ability to reason is a grace. Grace comes from God. They cannot have what they have rejected, and it shows.

Chesterton said, “The man who loves his own children is much more universal, is much more fully in the general order, than the man who dandles the infant hippopotomus or puts the young crocodile in the perambulator.” The McCanns are normal, their love for their children is rational and reasonable. Their actions make sense. The media, the mirror of our corrupt society, is absurd.  It’s actions are erratic and senseless. It is a monster out of control, wheeling its monstrous offspring around in a perambulator.

How often do we hear them weep from the TV about a lost elephant or, recently in Ireland, about 400 “small animals and insects” that died in an overheated car? Cruelty! Cruelty and terror for stick insects! And yet, you and I are walking around petrified for our children because we don’t know where the next paedophile might be lurking, or the next neglected and crazed adolescent with his own gun.

And of course there is always this paranoia. This feeling that if you shout at your child, or if you stop your child from running out into traffic by smacking them, or if you fall short of this “unknown standard” in some way you might end up in prison.

 The McCann story is the epitome of all these fears together. The McCann story is frightening. It frightens me, and if you are rational, it frightens you. Because all the McCann parents did was to love their child and go to the ends of the earth to find her. Unfortunately, as it now seems for them, there was an “appetite” for their story. Now this has turned into an appetite for them.

Society is sickening for something. We live in a wretched time where God is being rejected. We are losing our children and so, we are losing our minds.

The pack turns on the McCanns because they remind us of our worst nightmare. Meanwhile the rest of us, who have no “appetite” for this frenzy, can pray that the McCanns find their little girl and the world finally leaves them alone.

Jesus said on his walk to Golgotha, “Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not over me; but weep for yourself and your children. For behold the days shall come, wherein they will say: blesssed are the barren and the wombs that have not borne…..”

Categories: Catholic · Media · News · Opinion

Do You Think The Media In Northern Ireland Will Ever Cover The Abortion Issue Fairly?

September 11, 2007 · 2 Comments

Fox News in America has broadcast an expose of International Planed Parentood Federation (parent organisation of the Family Planing Association/fpaNI) , showing them as abortion crazy and money hungry.

Hannitiy, well known anchorman, presents the show which you can see if you CLICK HERE.

Its no real surprise the IPPF loves murder and lies. Their founder, Margaret Sanger, used to give speaches to Klu Klux Klan ralies. Recently prominant human rights speaker Alvda King has claimed that IPPF has “done what the Klan could only dream of” as most abortions proportionally in America are committed on black women.

Alveda King will be in Belfast soon as part of a tour. Do you think the media here will cover her views on the Unborn Child and abortion?

 She is, after all Martin Luther Kings neice. Still no dice BBC? UTV? “Irish” News? Belfast Telegraph…………….

Categories: Abortion · Media · News

Ethical Guidance Issued By The Medical Council of Ireland On Abortion May Be Illegal.

September 6, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Here is an extract from the Submission of the ACLI to the Medical Council of Ireland for their review of the current Ethics Guidance:(Click here for link to full submission)

The following is submitted in relation to section 24.6 of the IMC Guide to Ethical Conduct and Behaviour;

This section should be revised to read, as it formerly read, The deliberate and intentional destruction of the unborn child is professional misconduct. Should a child in utero lose its life as a side-effect of standard medical treatment of the mother, then this is not unethical. Refusal by a doctor to treat a woman with a serious illness because she is pregnant would be grounds for complaint and could be considered to be professional misconduct

The reason for this submission is that the present phrase contained in section 24.6 which reads;

“real and substantive risk to the life of the mother.” (s.24.6 IMC Guide to Ethical Conduct and Behaviour)

allows direct, intentional abortion………..……….”

The ACLI submission goes on to say:

“Therefore the current phrase in the IMC guidelines is manifestly ILLEGAL, in that is supports the direct and delberate abortion of a child.”

The date for close of submissions is 7th September. One more day for anyone who wishes to make their views known!

Categories: Abortion · Catholic · Legal/Medical · News